na tu tat sāmānyam eva tāsām, buddhyākāratvenānyatrānugamāt
>>> na tu tat sāmānyam eva tāsām, buddhyākāratvenānyatrāna
(Consequently I would like to emend the text given in McCrea and Patil 2010:117)
The translation by McCrea and Patil 2010:79 (and also 23):
``But that image itself is not a universal belonging to those particulars because it recurs elsewhere as a mental image."
I would like to suggest: "... because it does not
This emendation is supported by Dharmakirti's PVSV 40.6: tasya teṣv abhāvāt
For Dharmakirti's intention, see Kataoka 2010: "Mittsu no Apoha-setsu" in South Asian Classical Studies, Vol. 5.
- 2010/12/19(日) 11:29:17|